Space 1999 Eagle Transporter Forum


Go Back   Space 1999 Eagle Transporter Forum > Deep Space Tracking Station > A Matter of Balance

Notices

SPONSORED BY
&

Reply Bookmark and Share
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-09-2008, 06:45 AM   #1
Senmut
Eagle Pilot
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Right here. Someplace.
Posts: 622
Default Chinese Say They're Building 'Impossible' Space Drive

Interesting.

========================

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/0...e-buildin.html



Chinese Say They're Building 'Impossible' Space Drive
By David Hambling September 24, 2008 | 10:29:00 AMCategories: Bizarro, Science!, Space


Chinese researchers claim they've confirmed the theory behind an "impossible" space drive, and are proceeding to build a demonstration version. If they're right, this might transform the economics of satellites, open up new possibilities for space exploration - and give the Chinese a decisive military advantage in space.

To say that the "Emdrive" (short for "electromagnetic drive") concept is controversial would be an understatement. According to Roger Shawyer, the British scientist who developed the concept, the drive converts electrical energy into thrust via microwaves, without violating any laws of physics. Many researchers believe otherwise. An article about the Emdrive in New Scientist magazine drew a massive volley of criticism. Scientists not only argued that Shawyer's work was blatantly impossible, and that his reasoning was flawed. They also said the article should never have been published.

"It is well known that Roger Shawyer's 'electromagnetic relativity drive' violates the law of conservation of momentum, making it simply the latest in a long line of 'perpetuum mobiles' that have been proposed and disproved for centuries," wrote John Costella, an Australian physicist. "His analysis is rubbish and his 'drive' impossible."

Shawyer stands by his theoretical work. His company, Satellite Propulsion Research (SPR), has constructed demonstration engines, which he says produce thrust using a tapering resonant cavity filled with microwaves. He is adamant that this is not a perpetual motion machine, and does not violate the law of conservation of momentum because different reference frames apply to the drive and the waves within it. Shawyer's big challenge, he says, has been getting people who will actually look into his claims rather than simply dismissing them.

Such extravagant claims are usually associated with self-taught, backyard inventors claiming Einstein got it all wrong. But Shawyer is a scientist who has worked with radar and communication systems and was a program manager at European space company EADS Astrium; his work rests entirely on Einstein being right. The thrust is the result of a relativistic effect and would not occur under simple Newtonian physics. Many have dismissed his work out of hand, and British government funding has ceased. He has had some interest from both the United States and China. Now the Chinese connection with the Northwestern Polytechnical University (NPU) in Xi'an seems to have paid off.

"NPU started their research program in June 2007, under the supervision of Professor Yang Juan. They have independently developed a mathematical simulation which shows unequivocally that a net force can be produced from a simple resonant tapered cavity," Shawyer tells Danger Room. "The thrust levels predicted by this simulation are similar to those resulting from the SPR design software, and the SPR test results."

What's more, Shawyer says, NPU is "currently manufacturing" a "thruster" based on this theoretical work.

The NPU have confirmed that they have reproduced the theoretical work, and are building a demosntration version of the Emdrive.

Needless to say, independent confirmation is a big deal -- though many will want to see it published in a peer-reviewed journal. Even when it is, I doubt the controversy will subside. Prof. Yang has plenty of experience in this type of area, having previously done work on microwave plasma thrusters, which use a resonant cavity to accelerate a plasma jet for propulsion. While the theory behind the Emdrive is very different, the engineering principles of building the hardware are similar. The Chinese should be capable of determining whether the thruster really works or whether the apparent forces are caused by experimental errors.

The thrust produced is small, but significant. Shawyer compares a C-Band Emdrive with the existing NSTAR ion thruster used by NASA. The Emdrive produces 85 mN of thrust compared to 92 for the NSTAR (that's about one-third of an ounce), but the Emdrive only consumes a quarter of the amount of power and weighs less than 7 kilos, compared to over 30 kilos. The biggest difference is in propellant: NSTAR uses 10 grams per hour; the Emdrive uses none. As long as it has an electricity supply, the Emdrive will keep going.

The possibilities are phenomenal: Instead of going out of service when they run out of fuel, satellites would have greatly extended endurance and be able to move around at will. (We wouldn't have to shoot them down because of the risk from toxic fuel either.) Deep space probes could go further, faster - and stop when they arrive. Shawyer calculates that a solar-powered Emdrive could take a manned mission to Mars in 41 days. Provided it works, of course.

What will China do with the technology? It may be relevant that professor Yang is not unknown in military circles, having published a paper called "Plasma Attack Against Low-Orbit Spy Satellites."

Meanwhile, what about the American interest? Shawyer told me that "the flight thruster program is on hold for the present. [O]nce the U.K. government had provided an export license for a U.S. military application, the major U.S. aerospace company we had been dealing with stopped talking to us. "

The company may have decided that the Emdrive could not work. If they're wrong, China has at least a year's head start in a technology that will dominate space and make previous satellites as obsolete as sailing ships in the age of steam.
Senmut is off duty   Bookmark and Share Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 03:54 AM   #2
Senmut
Eagle Pilot
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Right here. Someplace.
Posts: 622
Default

What, no interest?
Senmut is off duty   Bookmark and Share Reply With Quote
Old 13-10-2008, 06:53 AM   #3
Slartibartfast
Weapons Technician
 
Slartibartfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rochdale
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senmut View Post
What, no interest?
I wouldn't lend too much credence to the report - some of these provincial Chinese universities are pretty Mickey Mouse. My girlfriend teaches in one and has the title "Professor" - she's just a tutor.

Personally, I don't see how you can impart thrust with this thing, maybe I'm just thick?
Slartibartfast is off duty   Bookmark and Share Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2008, 04:43 AM   #4
Senmut
Eagle Pilot
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Right here. Someplace.
Posts: 622
Default

Not being a physicist, I wouldn't know. I just wanted to foment discussion on the topic. After all, since we're all fans of the show, space propulsion is a topic of some interest.
Senmut is off duty   Bookmark and Share Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2008, 11:16 AM   #5
alienation
Eagle Pilot
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 718
Default

a thrust from perpetual motion? In my house we obey the laws of thermodynamics.
alienation is off duty   Bookmark and Share Reply With Quote

Old 17-10-2008, 04:20 PM   #6
Hawk
Communications Officer
 
Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Louisiana, United States
Posts: 785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alienation View Post
a thrust from perpetual motion? In my house we obey the laws of thermodynamics.
You'll never get anywhere if you do that!
Hawk is off duty   Bookmark and Share Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site and contents are copyright Bernard Walsh 2010 all rights reserved, no reproduction of material in any form without written permission email: Bernie.walsh@mac.com