![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Commander
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Glos, UK
Posts: 4,335
|
Sean has sent images of his Eagles, he has three the smallest is 44" then comes the mighty 66" and if that isn't big enough the colossal 88" monster.
As you can imagine, Sean has to pick up and put down these models as his schedule is extremely busy so they are all work in progress. I have never seen an engine bell that is almost the size of a kettle...!! Check out these images: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hydroponics Technician
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 38
|
I'd just posted a reply on the Straker's Car thread when I spotted this new spin-off. The eagles look brilliant, which begs the question of is there a purpose other than being for show, I mean an 88'' Eagle would be some ornament on a mantlepiece. Many thanks to Sean for sending the images, now we have two great threads at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Commander
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Glos, UK
Posts: 4,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Astrophysics Technician
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Posts: 416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Medical Officer
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 3,320
|
Sean Robinson, extremely impressive Eagles
including a 66" and 88" |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Astrophysics Technician
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 449
|
HOLY....sh.....it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Computer Technician
![]() Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 207
|
HOLY GHOST!!!.In the next Eagle he'll made this forumners wants the co-pilot seat!.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Communications Officer
![]() Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 761
|
I don't know why he doesn't just make a full sized one I can play with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Astrophysics Technician
![]() Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Truro, Cornwall, UK
Posts: 314
|
Very good of you to share the eye candy with us! Thanks very much...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Deputy Commander
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Seaford, East Sussex.
Posts: 823
|
That's just incredible!
But if you don't mind a little constructive criticism, in the third pic from the top, the CM looks a little 'fat' and perhaps too short? It may just be the lens distortion of the camera? Either way - my mind's going crazy thinking about the level of detail available at such a scale... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Computer Technician
![]() Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 207
|
I think it'll admit all the details on a 1:1 scale ship.Yes the CM seems a little shorter and fatter than what would correspond to the rest of the vehicle.I would like to see your question answered,too.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|