Space 1999 Eagle Transporter Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • We have updated the Terms and Conditions, you will be prompted to read and agree to these next time you are active on the forum.
SPONSORED BY

Which planes might have flown?

Odahs

Alphans
Hmm...I don't remember ever seeing the captain scarlet models for sale. Just some thunderbirds. We had the dinky toys, but I didn't know where they came from ...never saw captain scarlet broadcast here.

I did notice a lot of ' extra' stuff in the annuals ...I did kinda wonder whether they had any guidance, or just made it up.

Also, I think now when our kiwi cousin wrote 'serious', he was trying to mean 'in regular service' ...

I was reading the UFO annual the other night and it suggested the UFO Mobiles were amphibious, which was never in the show. The annual gave their speed on land and in water. Could explain that funny wheel like thing and all that detailing at the back, might have been the water propulsion system.

It's intriguing whether it was creative writers filling in explanations for what they saw in the shows, or if it was all established before the models were even ever made though.

Not sure what our kiwi cousin meant. There is a huge jump though between any technology being taken seriously and being used in regular service. Didn't really get the first post about the Osprey, it all seemed very negative and dismissive to me from the outset.
 

Ham Salad

Alphans
Not sure what our kiwi cousin meant. There is a huge jump though between any technology being taken seriously and being used in regular service. Didn't really get the first post about the Osprey, it all seemed very negative and dismissive to me from the outset.

Well, I just hope I didn't go too far with funnin the poor fellow. I'm sure the difficulty was just a matter of semantics and idiom. I'm sure there's some lack of exposure to other countries and other cultures there, too: you really have to travel with an open mind to realize that conditions are RADICALLY different in different places.

***

Maybe I'M lucky in a way: since I didn't get to see most of the anderson shows until they came out of dvd, there are still lots that I haven't seen yet. For example , they didn't show the last season of space precinct here except at 1 am, so I didn't see most of them...now I can watch at my leisure.

I'm quite looking forward to FIREBALL XL5.
 
Last edited:
I forget the in show name but in the Thunderbirds 2nd episode 'Pit of Peril' there is an interesting VTOL which looks like a helicopter where they removed the rotors and added two jet engines to each side pointing downwards.
It may not be practical, but what really impressed me was that when you saw it on screen you could tell instantly how it worked and why. That visual approach is what really sets the GA vehicles apart- they may have weird wings and propulsion packages strewn about, but when you look at them you can see how they are supposed to work and what all the different parts do. The Fireflash is a good example- passenger cabins with massive windows in the wings, pilots in a pod assembly with the tail, additional engines in the top of the T-Tail and landing gear in folding pods. A fanciful design, but when you look at it you can see the engineering behind the design.
 

Ham Salad

Alphans
I A fanciful design, but when you look at it you can see the engineering behind the design.

Well, yes: the style of 'form follows function' in studio design for miniatures is something heavily associated with GA shows...for some reason, it was like a pervasive inclination that went from one show to the next.

Heck, would these shows have become so popular and so etched in the collective mind had the models looked more like the earlier attempts to make everything look like a streamlined train? The designs look like they do what they are supposed to be: that's what makes them so convincing, you immediately just accept they are what they appear to be.

The vehicle you mentioned, I seem to remember that was the 'helijet' , is a good example. it seems so reasonable, and since it is just a bit forward in the way it works makes it easy to swallow.

Come to think of it, the general feel of workaday believability lets them get away with things that you don't think about until later....like , 'why are there air scoops on that space ship'?

Of course, as you know, this had such a great effect on industrial design in general that you can see echos of Gerry anderson in real vehicles...possibly unconsciously. And of course, they inspired whole generations of designers and model builders for movies and TV. In japan, for example, it used to be traditional to have a 'gerry anderson tribute' episode in every show that featured mecha; and even the ones that didn't you'd often see them snuck into the background (I saw a recent show that had SID slide by in an orbital shot, for example.) I've often seen crowd scenes where you'd see someone in an international rescue uniform directing traffic in the BG., or an airport where you might see the nose of SHADAIR sticking out of a hanger behind the airliners in the foreground.

Anything here look familiar?

 
Last edited:

TV21Dalek

Alphans
Of course, as you know, this had such a great effect on industrial design in general that you can see echos of Gerry anderson in real vehicles...possibly unconsciously. And of course, they inspired whole generations of designers and model builders for movies and TV. In japan, for example, it used to be traditional to have a 'gerry anderson tribute' episode in every show that featured mecha; and even the ones that didn't you'd often see them snuck into the background (I saw a recent show that had SID slide by in an orbital shot, for example.) I've often seen crowd scenes where you'd see someone in an international rescue uniform directing traffic in the BG., or an airport where you might see the nose of SHADAIR sticking out of a hanger behind the airliners in the foreground.

Anything here look familiar?


I know that in "Gunbuster" they had TB5 in the background. In the "Compiler" comic bad girl Compiler had a version of TB2 that had the engines replaced by the lower parts of TB3, and a shark mouth added for effect. "Neon Genesis Evangelion" TV series opening sequence was inspired by the UFO titles.
 

Ham Salad

Alphans
I know that in "Gunbuster" they had TB5 in the background. In the "Compiler" comic bad girl Compiler had a version of TB2 that had the engines replaced by the lower parts of TB3, and a shark mouth added for effect. "Neon Genesis Evangelion" TV series opening sequence was inspired by the UFO titles.

Urusei yatsura has thunderbirds, UFO, and captin scarlet throughout the animated series and movies.

By the way, did you know Gerry did a japanese TV show called Fireflash?
 
So, there's nothing familiar looking....like the uniforms with the colored vests...with the odd flying hand shaped logo that just might have the letters IR in it?
Wasn't there an Japanese Thunderbirds Anime show? IIRC they had the totally different craft, more of them and a huge base to operate from. It was more of an 'In Name Only' show but I think Starlog covered it once.
 

Odahs

Alphans
They did put glasses on the Captain Scarlet puppet when it turned up in "The Secret Service".

I watched The Secret Service at first to see the links to what was before and what came after, there are plenty. Seeing Captain Scarlet appear was one of the highlights. Can't remember the episode or his role now, but it was definitely a great moment. :thumbup:
 
Top